Fertility Specialists back warnings on human reproductive cloning
14th August 2003
Human reproductive cloning is not ethically or practically acceptable
according to the British Fertility Society1. The Society has spoken
out in support of an article in the current edition of Human
Fertility that highlights the scientific hazards of cloning.
Writing in the current edition of the journal Human Fertility,
Dr Lorraine Young (Nottingham University) highlights some of the
practical problems and uncertainties which would surround the cloning
of humans2. She says that there are 3 main areas of concern:
Miscarriages
Cloning (or Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer) has now been achieved
in sheep, cow, mouse, cat, rabbit, goat and pig, prompting the discussion
of whether this technique should now be used in humans, for example
to treat infertile couples. Dr Young points out that in all species
so far studied, the numbers of pregnant females producing live babies
is very low (usually 2-10%, exceptionally 20%). This means that
many women would have to endure a huge miscarriage rate before a
single cloned human baby is born. The reasons for death during pregnancy
are not known, but are likely related to severe malformations of
the fetus.
Birth defects
While cloned offspring have been born that appear normal at and
soon after birth, many have also been born with very severe defects.
The incidence and appearance of these defective offspring is entirely
unpredictable and there are no appropriate screening methods available
for use at present.
Long-term health
The oldest SCNT cloned animal was Dolly, who at six years at her
death was no-where near her natural lifespan. Cloned mice develop
problems such as obesity in old age. Before cloned people are considered,
the long-term health implications of cloning need to be much more
carefully studied. Treating infertility with a cloned offspring
who faces an uncertain future is not a responsible parental choice.
Dr Young says "There are of course serious ethical concerns
over whether or not reproductive cloning should be considered at
all, but even if these were overcome there are practical problems
which would stop responsible scientists from pressing ahead. There
are too many unknowns, and this kind of experimenting on children
is not acceptable."
Professor Alison Murdoch, Chair of the British Fertility Society,
said "British Fertility Society members would support the
conclusions which Lorraine Young has reached. We want to work within
an accepted ethical framework, and as a Society we don't support
this type of cloning. Dr Young's conclusions show that it's not
only morally questionable to try to clone a human, it's also practically
unacceptable."
1The British Fertility Society is a national multidisciplinary
organisation representing professionals practising in the field
of reproductive medicine.
2Human Fertility Volume 6 No 2 pp 59-63
For more information: please contact the British Fertility Society press office
|